Talk by Cordelia Mühlenbeck
DLCE Talk
- Date: May 4, 2016
- Time: 02:00 PM - 03:00 PM (Local Time Germany)
- Speaker: Cordelia Mühlenbeck
- University of Chemnitz
- Location: MPI SHH Jena
- Room: Villa V03
- Host: Department of Linguistic and Cultural Evolution
- Contact: schueck@shh.mpg.de
On the origins of artistic behaviour and aesthetic universals
Art in all its various forms, such as painting, sculpture, music, as
well as in everyday areas such as design or architecture, is a
fundamental expression of modern humans. Among the oldest artefacts that
play a role in regard to the origins of artistic behaviour are the
remains of stones and other objects with engravings and colourful
markings. In my previous work, I analysed the evolution of modern humans
and the related theories about their cognitive capacities, to show what
the background of the emergence of these first marked objects could
have been. Furthermore, for some reasons these early marked objects can
be regarded as the beginning of symbolic behaviour, because they had a
benefit for the individuals’ visual perception, and most likely also as
an informative reference for others. To get information about the
perception of these markings and their representation in shape and
colour, I conducted three eye-tracking studies in a cross-species
(humans, orang-utans) and cross-cultural (Namibian hunter-gatherers and
German town dwellers) comparison. The aim of the studies was to
investigate the visual perception of marked and unmarked objects
(study1), symmetrical and asymmetrical patterns (study 2), and different
colours combined with an auditory stimulus (study 3). Furthermore, in
studies 1 and 2 an aesthetic preference test was carried out with the
two human cultural groups in order to obtain information on whether
there could have been shared underlying aesthetic preferences for
designing and highlighting the objects. The results show that both human
groups, despite their different cultural and ecological habitats,
preferred markings and symmetrical patterns in their visual observation,
but orangutans did not. Regarding the aesthetic preference, however,
the human subjects showed no consistent preference, neither in terms of
the marked objects, nor in terms of the symmetric patterns. Also, the
three groups showed a very different spatial perception of the objects
in relation to the background. The results of the third study, which was
only conducted in a species-comparison, show that no consistent colour
preference was visible for the human subjects, only a consistent
avoidance of yellow. In the orangutan group no preference or avoidance
was visible. Combined with an auditory stimulus, the visual perception
of the colours remained constant for both groups. These studies show
that humans respond differently to visual signs than other primates, and
that they recognise them as such in their perception. This is an
indirect indication of the origin of marking behaviour and is consistent
with the theories of cultural transmission of knowledge through the
invention of material symbols.